The Evolution of Fish

Compartir
Insertar
  • Publicado el 23 ene 2016
  • The evolution of fish began about 530 million years ago during the Cambrian explosion. Early fish from the fossil record are represented by a group of small, jawless, armoured fish known as ostracoderms. Jawless fish lineages are mostly extinct. An extant clade, the lampreys may approximate ancient pre-jawed fish. The first jaws are found in Placoderm fossils. The diversity of jawed vertebrates may indicate the evolutionary advantage of a jawed mouth. It is unclear if the advantage of a hinged jaw is greater biting force, improved respiration, or a combination of factors. The evolution of fish is not studied as a single event since fish do not represent a monophyletic group but a paraphyletic one (by exclusion of the tetrapods).

Comentarios • 2 514

  • Mark Adkins
    Mark Adkins Hace 14 días

    This is undeniable Truth based facts, the evidence is right in front of all religious and conspiracy theorists faces. Those who deny these facts are waste of oxygen.

  • Mishu Sxcubby
    Mishu Sxcubby Hace 16 días

    THE THUMBNAIL WAS SCARY AS FUCK

  • MrNikosnik
    MrNikosnik Hace un mes

    Listening while being high, is perfeeect and makes my feet feel good lol thanks producer for choosing this person from England prob. And may God bless all of us ,all of the good people !!!! I think the comentator is a mister that did jail interviews??? Thanks and I'll suscribe to catch all your vid's ☮️ Peace From Greece!!!!!!

  • nope No way
    nope No way Hace un mes

    No one will believe me but me and my mom caught a pakaderm catfish in the everglades back in the 90s

  • Hokunin
    Hokunin Hace un mes

    we were once a fish... realizing it feels weird

  • tr889
    tr889 Hace 2 meses +1

    NOPE.....esclips.com/video/KK3eh4Z5Ko4/vídeo.html&t=205s&list=FLJ85Hw_iZPR7lLvWwF4oPjw&index=2

    • Devilmonkey
      Devilmonkey Hace un mes

      Just give your money to the charlatan prison inmate
      He loves retards like you

  • tomrider
    tomrider Hace 2 meses

    wait, rewind to the beginning...how did the fish come about? what was happening between microbes and first fish? how the trilobites come about? this evolution has some gaps or wtf?

  • surg23
    surg23 Hace 2 meses

    While quite vague, it was a lovely documentary. Extremely good CGI and great narration and music. Just awesome!

  • Ernest Imken
    Ernest Imken Hace 2 meses +1

    No creature has ever been found that is part one species and part another. These guesswork stories presented as fact make it seem like they found all the fossils that don't exist.

    • The Bronze Tank
      The Bronze Tank Hace un mes

      thats not how it works

    • Devilmonkey
      Devilmonkey Hace 2 meses

      Just how brainwashed and uneducated are you?

    • Devilmonkey
      Devilmonkey Hace 2 meses

      Are you really that stupid?
      Seriously are you?

  • BFDT
    BFDT Hace 2 meses +2

    Well, no matter, the anti-evolution, anti-science trolls are Un-American. By deprecating science and the way of evidence testing, THEY are dis-empowering American academic preeminence, power and economic control. They are the willing accomplices of Russian trolls who work to make Russia the master of the USA (through Trump?).
    Keep people stupid by keeping their noses in the Bible, and you have bridges that fall down, cars that don't last and food and medicine killing us rather than nourishing us.
    All because they think they are going to heaven. Tsk tsk.

  • BFDT
    BFDT Hace 2 meses +1

    I repost this because it's important. Evolution does not employ forethought, purpose, planning or design. The phrase "in order to" is wrong when used to describe "descent with modification".
    Here is my year old post:
    1 year ago (edited)
    Seems to me here that the language used to express evolution is wrong. Evolution is a matter of surviving with existing equipment by repurposing it and -- surprise -- surviving to reproduce! Such words as "strategy" or "striving" or "in order to" are wrong.
    Especially in a related video "Evolution of the Backbone", where the spine was a place where calcium accumulated and -- surprise -- that calcium was able to be dissolved and used to power the heart when surrounding calcium was depleted.
    No forethought. No planning. No design.

  • To Serve Man
    To Serve Man Hace 2 meses

    Everyone knows evolution aint real. What about the irreducible entroby?

    • To Serve Man
      To Serve Man Hace un mes

      Pretty neat, huh?

    • Devilmonkey
      Devilmonkey Hace un mes

      irreducible entroby
      That's not a thing.....
      Just how uneducated are you?

    • To Serve Man
      To Serve Man Hace 2 meses

      Likes his own post immediately.

    • BFDT
      BFDT Hace 2 meses +2

      "what about"
      yeah, yeah, yeah...

  • MichaelKingsfordGray
    MichaelKingsfordGray Hace 2 meses

    Only half of the video!

  • Vincent Beville
    Vincent Beville Hace 2 meses

    Only White People believe we came from freaking fish. Idiots.

    • Devilmonkey
      Devilmonkey Hace un mes

      Neil deGrasse Tyson is white?
      First we steal your music now we're stealing your scientists.
      So sad.

  • Erg Budster
    Erg Budster Hace 2 meses

    What a crock. This character does not understand evolution whatsoever. Like many a bonehead he shoves teleology again and again into the picture. No, the fish were not making "strategies". No, the earth did not sometimes affect their strategies. That is so ignorant it just appalls me. Stuff just happens. There is no thinking and no deciding involved in any of this. DNA mutates spontaneously, perhaps due to radiation. New forms begin utterly by accident. IF they are better adapted to a particular environment they survive. If not, they don't. There ain't no strategy there, son. None what so ever. MOST die. A few have the right stuff for the right times. If times change, they die out. Period. No strategy there, bubba. None what so ever. The writer of this crap should be horsewhipped out of town on a rail.

  • rbspider
    rbspider Hace 2 meses

    None of this is in the bible

    • Devilmonkey
      Devilmonkey Hace 2 meses

      So how does this sky wizard magic work and why is he such a genocidal slavery loving dick?

    • Toni Romic
      Toni Romic Hace 2 meses

      Long and tedious reply's filled with caps lock and atheistic anger will not make your points valid nor will change the fact that you taking things way to literary and expect Bible to be a doctorate on everything.
      "NO I POINTED OUT HOW FALLACIOUSLY FLAWED YOUR EXAMPLE WAS and that the time differential between a person on a spaceship orbiting the planet and that of a person on the planet would be NEGLIGIBLY SMALL"
      My example was just that, an example which non the less shows relativity of time and in no way it said "ORBITING THE PLANET" like you keep pushing again, by the way you don't mention direction in which this imaginary spaceship orbits the planet, rotation or counter rotation direction.
      But that doesn't matter in my "FALLACIOUSLY FLAWED" example so don't get caught up in that literal boy.
      If the spaceship stands still or moves slowly time would go slower for the crew (they would have aged more) than on the person on fast rotating planet, or if you like on the another spaceship which goes almost at light speed.
      Yes I know that kind of spaceship is not built and maybe never will be, so skip the need for long part of the answer with caps explaining that.
      It does shows how the nature functions however.
      Rest of your answer is just atheistic angry literal taking rant that doesn't deserve to be read let alone answered to.
      What kind of answer do you expect on this illogical claim that Bible should list all species and that it should mention viruses, bacteria.
      God gave us minds to find out that on our own and write books about each specific bacteria if one wishes. This is not main purpose of the Bible.
      According to you Genesis would have been compilation of 1000 books 1000 page each to explain every living thing before human, and evolution of human it self.
      Why do the species die of and why did not God created and cemented few species and kept it like that? Please!
      If you are going to ask angry, ill formed, illogical questions based on your superficially thought genetics, physics and biology accompanied by your animosity of the Bible and some sort of delusional demand that Bible should be book about every strand of virus and bacteria, every tiny step in the evolution of every species, every step humanity has taken than I don't think you really expect nor want answers, it seems more that you are just like a protester in the crowd holding a sign which displays to the world his beliefs hopping that will be read by greater number of people as possible, since this kind of book would be multi-million page book.
      Nowhere in Bible is mentioned that Earth is flat nor that Sun revolves around Earth even thought people of those times thought so.
      God created a self sustaining ever changing system in which everything is in motion and dynamic and in which death is part of life same as birth.

    • Kobus Leach
      Kobus Leach Hace 2 meses

      You on the other hand import new variable in this imaginary situation and say
      "as the spaceship would in all likelihood orbit the planet faster than the planet rotates around its axis"
      NO I POINTED OUT HOW FALLACIOUSLY FLAWED YOUR EXAMPLE WAS and that the time differential between a person on a spaceship orbiting the planet and that of a person on the planet would be NEGLIGIBLY SMALL (not a massive difference like in YEARS) and that the person on the spaceship is the ONE (by my example) that would age less (less time have elapsed for him) as OPPOSED to the person on the planet. FURTHERMORE, your flawed logic trying to use your ill-devised example as a explanation why we shouldn't assume that a DAY in the BIBLE WASN'T A DAY ACCORDING TO WHAT WE NOW DEFINE AS A DAY is pathetic.
      SHOULD THE BIBLE BE READ AS LITERAL? IF SO THE BIBLE ACCOUNT OF CREATION IS AN ILLOGICAL, TOTALLY INCONSISTENT WITH WHAT WE KNOW OF ALL LIFEFORMS AND THE UNIVERSE. The bible refers to HEAVENS ? which one is the one of PARADISE all you fools seek/strive to go too. How many are there and what the FUCK is A HEAVEN ANYWAYS?. Come on can't the bible be MORE DESCRIPTIVE or is it INTENTIONALLY VAGUE and AMBIGIOUS.
      IF NOT HOW ELSE ? IS THE BIBLE SUPPOSED TO BE INTERPRETED METAPHORICALLY / ALLEGORICALLY?
      If we treat the bible as allegorical why the FUCK should we ASSUME that this GOD is REAL then and not just a FABLE with a underlining message. That means NO SIN, NO GOD, NO JESUS EVER EXISTED, NO FUCKING ADAM AND EVE and their incestual exploits.
      So no matter HOW you want to VIEW it, THE BIBLE REGARDLESS REMAINS A COMPILATION OF BULLSHIT where some were burrowed from earlier deistic religious texts and has ABSOLUTE NO RELEVANCE TO
      MORALITY OR REALITY WHATSOEVER.
      "Should Bible name every living organism past en present which existed before humans?"
      1) What the bible means with KINDS definitely needs to be defined and clarified and this answer needs to be specified IN THE BIBLE and not interpreted as any interpretation is SUBJECTIVE and it would only follow that if it needs interpretation it CAN'T BE LITERALLY REAL and needs to be viewed as allegorical. IF it is allegorical why believe in an imaginary metaphorical GOD in the first place? WTF!!!!
      2) If "GOD's CREATION" in the bible were REMOTELY FACTUAL it wouldn't have skipped past so many steps. BIRDS are descendants of NON-FLYING DINOSAURS (Maniraptorans) of which is just ONE single CLADE of DINOSAURAMORPHAN SAUROPODAMORPHAN SAURISCHIAN ARCHOSAURS among SAURISCHIANS which are distinct from PTEROSAURAMORPHANS ARCHOSAURS. It skipped WINGED NON-BIRDS (i.e BATS). IT MOST CERTAINLY WOULD NOT HAVE SKIPPED BACTERIA, ARCHAEA and VIRUSES if it was anyhow CONCORDANT with NATURAL REALITY.
      3) Because the bible DOES not define KINDS i needs to specify all SPECIES (since they are all separate "creations") and because it does not account for speciation (ONE KIND diverging into related SUB-KINDS)
      SURELY, YOUR GOD WOULD KNOW THE NAMES OF ALL HIS CREATIONS? and know how to differentiate them from each other.
      4) What about amphibians or reptiles ? they neither fish, nor bird , nor are they exclusively water or land based?
      5) Why did he KILL off 90% of his CREATED LIFEFORMS before US (for which he created everything for) so we can't marvel in their splendour , surely IT should have known that those LIFEFORMS WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN ABLE TO LIVE UNDER THOSE CONDITIONS. He is omniscient after all WTF MAN !!! This makes the whole story of NOAH's ARK nonsensical because firstly couldn't IT just eliminate all the non-believers without flooding the EARTH?. Otherwise his ark encounter was a terrible miserable FAILURE!!!!!! as so many species DIED OUT nonetheless and this most certainly don't SOUND like an INTELLIGENT NOR ALL POWERFUL GOD AT ALL. ALSO, I THOUGHT ITS CREATIONS ARE PERFECT IN ITS IMAGE (or is it just humans but we not perfect either as we acquire 1000s of genetic diseases and suffer and die DUE to OTHER PERFECT CREATIONS HE DID NOT MENTION (BACTERIA, VIRUSES, PROTOZOANS). HEHEHE!!!! If he can't create ACTUAL PERFECT CREATIONS THEN IT CAN'T be PERFECT EITHER or ALL KNOWABLE.
      "all human kind indeed comes from very small tribe or maybe even same mother."
      Since the bible does not account for speciation where traits in the ancestral population can CHANGE would imply that genetics would disagree with that as various sub-population have different alleles for genes (HOW is that POSSIBLE) . Also, our common ancestral population diverge from an even older common ancestor which we share with our sister subspecies (Homo sapiense neanderthalensis & Denisovans) and myself have probably 2% Neatherthal admixture in me. Which MOTHER , Homo erectus, Homo heidelbergensis, Homo sapiens neanderthalensis? A POPULATION based on a single MALE/FEMALE pair of essentially any mammal would not be feasible due to lack of diversity. Various Homo sapiens sapiens sub-populations share multiple "COLLECTIVE" MOTHERS (Different unrelated & related mothers with similar DNA structure) with other sub-populations due to GENETIC DRIFT as well as other MUTATIONS DRIVEN BY ENVIRONMENTAL & GEOGRAPHIC FACTORS.
      "Church excepts and supports evolution theory, except some protestant fractions. Don't take everything so literary and except that"
      Those that accepts it distort it as the method by which GOD created living things (theistic evolution) which is a cop out. GO and ask most religious folk whether the bible should be taken LITERALLY and they would answer in the affirmative. I DON'T take it LITERALLY i am just ridiculing how nonsensical, illogical, and ludicrous the bible SOUNDS when you TAKE it LITERALLY. But as i said earlier no matter how you see it, it still REMAINS UTTER MEANINGLESS BULLSHIT.
      "Bible is work of men inspired by God to describe acts of God and it uses metaphor and simplification and it does not go into every nitty-gritty detail of creation in subatomic level."
      You say it is inspired by GOD but this GOD is a metaphorical GOD so it is essentially equivalent to voices insane people hear LOL! MEN at that time HAD NO FUCKING IDEA about how stars form, what they are, how living organisms differentiate into different subspecies, how the solar system worked (sun don't orbit the earth nor is the earth flat and the sun located in earth's sky) for them to describe and write anything in detail about ANYTHING. This is why the bible is vague because it was written by ignorant, uninformed NITWITS.

    • Toni Romic
      Toni Romic Hace 2 meses

      Man you take things to literary!
      Planet rotation example was just hypothetical example to show that time is relative.
      Yes I know planets don't rotate this fast to bend time significantly, except maybe pulsars.
      "Time is a constructed idea and it is only a RELATIVE MEASURE and it is DEPENDENT ON THE REFERENCE FRAME of the observer."
      Yes I said that time is relative and is not fixed constant, no need to formulate it differently but if it makes you feel smarter go for it.
      I don't got it backwards, person on the space ship would age faster if space ship is relatively still as it was presumed by me when I wrote that. You on the other hand import new variable in this imaginary situation and say
      "as the spaceship would in all likelihood orbit the planet faster than the planet rotates around its axis"
      in that case yes but that was never said when I wrote simplified imaginary example which none the less shows that time is relative or imaginary construct if you wish.
      As far as your Bible rant goes you take writings way to literary just like you took my example to literary.
      You say why viruses, prehistoric animals were not mentioned and so on?
      Why would they be?
      This is not the point. Should Bible name every living organism past en present which existed before humans?
      It is said first came animals than humans, and genetic make up of humans is not all that different, there are scientific theories that
      all human kind indeed comes from very small tribe or maybe even same mother.
      Yes universe is vast and wondrous and we are tiny in it, so what. Who knows where future generations will go and in what ways?
      Church excepts and supports evolution theory, except some protestant fractions. Don't take everything so literary and except that
      Bible is work of men inspired by God to describe acts of God and it uses metaphor and simplification and it does not go into every nitty-gritty detail of creation in subatomic level.

    • Kobus Leach
      Kobus Leach Hace 2 meses

      "For example if you are on the planet which rotates really fast, much faster than planet Earth and someone is in the space ship just outside of this planets gravity"
      "With current technology severely limiting the velocity of space travel, however, the differences experienced in practice are minuscule: after 6 months on the International Space Station (ISS) (which orbits Earth at a speed of about 7, 7 km/s) an astronaut would have aged about 0.005 seconds less than those on Earth."
      Time is a constructed idea and it is only a RELATIVE MEASURE and it is DEPENDENT ON THE REFERENCE FRAME of the observer. The rotation speed of planets are influenced by several factors but it is still bounded by a maximum limit that it can attain except maybe a pulsar and that is not a planet. The fastest recorded orbiting planet (Beta Pictoris b which 16 times larger and 3000 times more massive than earth) is 25 km/s whereas earth rotates at 0,47 km/s, jupiter at 13 km/s so you can see how mass influences a planet's rotation speed (MASS is not the only factor though). So you got it backwards, the person on the spaceship would have aged less than the one on the planet itself as the spaceship would in all likelihood orbit the planet faster than the planet rotates around its axis (7.7 km/s compared to 0.47 km/s as an example)
      I just find it laughable to think that a SUPPOSED IMAGINARY GOD made a universe so incredibly massive for a one particular life form that could never ever explore the whole universe (We have only managed to land on our MOON never mind another planet in the same solar system) But your analogy about time dilation has nothing to do with how accurate the biblical account of the creation reflects REALITY.
      GENESIS 1
      DAY1
      In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.
      3 And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good, and he separated the light from the darkness. 5 God called the light “day,” and the darkness he called “night.” And there was evening, and there was morning-the first day.
      DAY4
      14 "And God said, “Let there be lights in the vault of the sky to separate the day from the night, and let them serve as signs to mark sacred times, and days and years, 15 and let them be lights in the vault of the sky to give light on the earth.” And it was so. 16 God made two great lights-the greater light to govern the day and the lesser light to govern the night. He also made the stars. 17 God set them in the vault of the sky to give light on the earth, 18 to govern the day and the night, and to separate light from darkness. And God saw that it was good. 19 And there was evening, and there was morning-the fourth day."
      DAY5
      20 And God said, “Let the water teem with living creatures, and let birds fly above the earth across the vault of the sky.” 21 So God created the great creatures of the sea and every living thing with which the water teems and that moves about in it, according to their kinds, and every winged bird according to its kind. And God saw that it was good. 22 God blessed them and said, “Be fruitful and increase in number and fill the water in the seas, and let the birds increase on the earth.” 23 And there was evening, and there was morning-the fifth day. 24 And God said, “Let the land produce living creatures according to their kinds: the livestock, the creatures that move along the ground, and the wild animals, each according to its kind.” And it was so. 25 God made the wild animals according to their kinds, the livestock according to their kinds, and all the creatures that move along the ground according to their kinds. And God saw that it was good.
      DAY6
      26 Then God said, “Let us make mankind in our image, in our likeness, so that they may rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky, over the livestock and all the wild animals,[a] and over all the creatures that move along the ground.” 27 So God created mankind in his own image, in the image of God he created them; male and female he created them. 28 God blessed them and said to them, “Be fruitful and increase in number; fill the earth and subdue it. Rule over the fish in the sea and the birds in the sky and over every living creature that moves on the ground.” 29 Then God said, “I give you every seed-bearing plant on the face of the whole earth and every tree that has fruit with seed in it. They will be yours for food. 30 And to all the beasts of the earth and all the birds in the sky and all the creatures that move along the ground-everything that has the breath of life in it-I give every green plant for food.” And it was so. 31 God saw all that he had made, and it was very good. And there was evening, and there was morning-the sixth day.
      1) DID he create two different light sources on DAY 1 and 4? and what the FUCK is the LESSER LIGHT as the MOON is NOT A LIGHT SOURCE LOL!!!!!
      2) Both supposed light sources day (SUN) and night (MOON) in our SKY which it separated from water on day 2 and then separated water from land on day 3 whereupon he generated PLANTS before unicellular prokaryotes and eukaryotes, VIRUSES REALLY!!!?
      3) WHAT the fuck is this FIRMAMENT/VAULT that it speaks off?
      4) WHAT the fuck is a kind? and birds are NOT the only animals with WINGS presently (nor in the past (pterosaurs)) just shows how illiterate the AUTHORS of the bible was. And why wasn't dinosaurs and any other prehistory animal mentioned?.
      5) Let "Us" who the fuck is US? that means plural? So is GOD a GREAT APE?
      Also the story of EVE being made from the RIB of ADAM would mean that she would ESSENTIALLY BE A RECOMBINANT FEMALE CLONE OF ADAM. This would mean that all of DIVERSITY OF HUMANITY IS AS A RESULT OF ADAM AND THAT MY FRIEND IS COMPLETELY INCONSISTENT WITH WHAT GENETICS SHOWS. MOREOVER, even though the bible does not explicitly refer to female progeny of ADAM & (ST)EVE but it still implies/requires repetitive INCEST between FATHER & DAUGHTER, MOTHER & SON AS WELL AS BROTHER & SISTER IN ORDER TO POPULATE THE PLANET TO WHAT IT IS NOW. We KNOW how inbreeding weakens/reduces/decreases the population's health gradually the more inbreeding events occurs within the population, therefore after several generations the human population would have acquired so many detrimental mutations from inbreeding that it WOULD HAVE INEVITABLY LED TO ITS EXTINCTION. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE GOODNESS OF CANCER and any other genetic diseases as the method in which they occur are INHERENT TO ALL LIVING ORGANISMS PRIOR TO THE SUPPOSED ORIGINAL SIN OF EVE.

  • Amorphous
    Amorphous Hace 2 meses

    life is astounding its beautiful

  • Jim Reimer
    Jim Reimer Hace 2 meses

    Fish have always been fish,as God designed them!

    • Devilmonkey
      Devilmonkey Hace un mes

      HEY RETARD
      DID YOU BRING THE SKY WIZARD MAGIC? We're waiting....
      YOU MAKE THE CLAIM YOU BRING THE EVIDENCE.

    • Devilmonkey
      Devilmonkey Hace un mes

      I'm sure you brought some of that sky wizard magic for us to test in a laboratory right....Right...RIGHT?
      Oh what's that? you couldn't get any sky wizard fairy tale magic...... typical dishonest christian.

    • Devilmonkey
      Devilmonkey Hace un mes

      How can you hate fairy tales?
      It's all make believe.
      *Just how fucking stupid are you* ?
      Honesty does not come from your imaginary fairy tale..... 6 billion people on the planet don't have your fairy tales and I bet you there are a large amount of honest people in there.

    • Jim Reimer
      Jim Reimer Hace un mes

      I find it interesting: You hate God ,the idea of which comes from the bible,then you go and put "Devil" in your name, the source also being the bible. Why believe in one and not the other? Also,you want me to be honest. Why? Honesty comes from God, not from the Devil! You choose the Devil,and then want all the good things from God!

    • Devilmonkey
      Devilmonkey Hace un mes

      Hey retard
      Did you bring any of your genocidal slavery loving wizard magic as evidence?
      I knew you wouldn't ...How dishonest of you...

  • Buburedshoe
    Buburedshoe Hace 2 meses

    The fish that adapted to life on land is weird because they would live in land then I think become reptiles ,and then some would become marine reptiles.I might be wrong.

  • Morbid Madness
    Morbid Madness Hace 3 meses

    Norway

  • Amy
    Amy Hace 3 meses

    Devonian Age Aquatic Dinosaur/Marine Life Fins....facebook.com/AmyDawn100963/

  • ThecatassassinX
    ThecatassassinX Hace 3 meses

    so wait does this count the theory of pangea? he says "continentSSS" so does that mean pangea happend after all this or before. can someone plz awnser

  • Tim Hansen
    Tim Hansen Hace 3 meses

    I would sell my soul to be able to travel back in time and walk through a Devonian forest.

  • Jemmy Wiratama
    Jemmy Wiratama Hace 3 meses +1

    His voice 👏

  • Steve Arcus
    Steve Arcus Hace 3 meses +1

    I really like science and the way it proves various things, but can't stand it when stories are made up to try and justify a theory. Undersea fossil A came out of the sea and became a land creature as fossil P, so the theory goes, but despite the huge fossil records scientists themselves admit there is no fossils C, E, G, I, K, G etc showing the transformation between the two to prove the process. Nor are there any creatures living at the half way point of the theorised macro evolution transformation.

    • Eddie X
      Eddie X Hace 3 meses

      No crocoduck, right?

  • anonyarena
    anonyarena Hace 3 meses

    at 12:57 I don't understand. - I was under the impression trees evolved to grow tall in order to better protect it's leaves from ground-level grazing animals. If the archaeopteris tree evolved to be tall during a time period before the first fish evolved into amphibians, what then was the evolutionary advantage of a 20m/60ft height?

    • BFDT
      BFDT Hace 2 meses +1

      Your mistake is in the phrase "evolved... in order to"
      That's simply not how it happens.
      Survival (and thereby able to replicate) of the FIT all the while subtle changes are being made (some good, some bad, and some neutral).
      Or as Darwin says: "Descent with modification"
      IF YOU SURVIVE, and then replicate, that's all there is. There is no future-looking or advantage-taking in the process of "descent with modification"
      You're thinking of design, which is NOT what evolution is.

    • Hm Grraarrpffrzz
      Hm Grraarrpffrzz Hace 3 meses

      To not be in the shade of higher plants.

  • Scott  Tomlin
    Scott Tomlin Hace 3 meses

    Evolution is so damn stupid.
    So your telling me that a space the size of a period, exploded and made everything. You people are tapped. And we humans came from monkeys.
    Than what are the monkeys doing here. And if the earth is millions or billions of years old
    Where are all the human remains? This whole video is a bullfaced lie. And you Godless sheep BELIEVE it.

    • BFDT
      BFDT Hace 2 meses +1

      There is no "God".

    • Lenny Mice
      Lenny Mice Hace 3 meses +5

      Scott Tomlin
      That's simplifying the big bang a bit but yes, that's what happened in a roundabout way.
      The great apes (chimpanzees, bonobos, orangutans and gorillas) are the animals that we share the closest common ancentry with. Monkeys are much more distant relatives. But in any case, why WOULDN'T the great apes or monkeys be here?
      The Earth is 4.543 billion years old. Humanity hasn't existed since the Earth first formed though. Humanity is only a few hundred thousand years old. So human remains only exist from within that period.

  • Matt McGovern
    Matt McGovern Hace 3 meses

    The thumbnail is infinity percent nope!!!

  • Gudjon Pall Gudmundsson

    Scientists believe. Very good program indeed!!

  • Fred Flintstone
    Fred Flintstone Hace 3 meses +1

    "The invention of the jaw".. .. ..

  • DSchea
    DSchea Hace 3 meses

    3:33 looks like a cock rock lmaooo

  • The pac Fish
    The pac Fish Hace 3 meses

    Ho come because the megalodon?

  • Mudisuda Raman
    Mudisuda Raman Hace 3 meses +1

    Videos like this must come with a warning that nobody really knows. These are based on speculations, assumptions and blind faith.

    • Mudisuda Raman
      Mudisuda Raman Hace 3 meses

      YOU DO NOT KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A THEORY AND A LAW IN SCIENCE. If you would meet Dawkins he will confirm to you that in Science EVOLUTION is a theory. The problem with a theory unlike a law is that it could be challenged and trashed. You also have to understand that theory does not mean that it is wrong. That means you cannot dismiss evolution on the basis that it is a theory.

    • Hm Grraarrpffrzz
      Hm Grraarrpffrzz Hace 3 meses

      There are no laws in empirical sciences, Mudisuda. Theories are in empirical science the most accurate form of description of a process or event. Again, you are uneducated and ignorant, and in addition you are too arrogant to assume that you might be wrong.

    • Mudisuda Raman
      Mudisuda Raman Hace 3 meses

      Cambrian Explosion: bigger problem for Darwinism than ever.
      esclips.com/video/8USBI0GSSOA/vídeo.html

    • Mudisuda Raman
      Mudisuda Raman Hace 3 meses

      The other matter where you erred is that I never stated or implied that something being a theory MAKES IT FALSE simply because it is a theory. There is a difference in Science between a theory and a Law. The latter is OBSERVABLE.

  • Chris Keith
    Chris Keith Hace 3 meses

    Coelacanths fossils from 65 million years ago look identical to Coelacanths today.
    They were thought to be extinct and transitional species between fish and reptiles, but lo and behold they were found alive today doing just fine. And the supposed anatomical features that were imagined to be transitional were absolutely not.
    Now I know evolutionist will jump to " perfectly suited environment" but there is zero evidence that they had some magical niche that was undisturbed for eons. Even worse is they have found 300 + supposed million year old Coelacanths and their morphology is virtually identical to Coelacanths of today, too How was this species of fish able to survive that many millions of years without its genome being changed from all the mutations that would have no doubt accrued over that time?
    Answer: It couldn't have. Best answer is it is not millions of years old.

    • Devilmonkey
      Devilmonkey Hace 3 meses

      Ignorance of Science is not evidence against it......

    • Hm Grraarrpffrzz
      Hm Grraarrpffrzz Hace 3 meses

      That coelacanth "looks" to you the same. But it is not the same. It evolves, but it evolves slowly. Claiming that it didn't evolve is ignorant, as scientists have learned a lot about its genome recently and published new studies on the differently evolved clades of that species.
      Your entire argument is based on your ignorance.

  • Blurry Flag
    Blurry Flag Hace 3 meses

    where's the second part?

  • Marcin Kielkiewicz
    Marcin Kielkiewicz Hace 3 meses

    +10 for dramatic music.

  • TheNurdbilly
    TheNurdbilly Hace 4 meses

    The lack of this part is why I was so disappointed in Spore.

  • readyxxi
    readyxxi Hace 4 meses

    evolution is a LIE

  • Thanos was Right
    Thanos was Right Hace 4 meses +1

    6/10 not enough fish

  • brooks townsley
    brooks townsley Hace 4 meses

    If you believe this nonsense then you'll believe this multiple genders infinite amount according to new College teachings

  • Bernie Schlàfer
    Bernie Schlàfer Hace 4 meses

    It's such a lovely story or version of life on earth... but one thing these scientists never seem to be able to give an answer to
    This 1st tree ? ? Grew and dropped leaves for food to develops into the soil!!?? As is being told And in doing so it gave food and chances for other plant life to take hold to develope to grow.... Oh it really does sound very nice and all.... But scientist
    " where are the seeds coming from that create all of these trees and plants including life....."
    No scientist can give an answer
    No plant can grow from nothing It MUST have a seed. So where were they from???

  • John 14: 9 من رآني فقد رأى الآب

    When fish can tap dance I'll believe this nonsense.

  • Rafly Maulana
    Rafly Maulana Hace 4 meses

    i like dinosaur

  • Joseph Selkow
    Joseph Selkow Hace 4 meses

    Obligatory subscribe button? LOL
    Subscribed.
    I had no choice. Fantastic content.

  • CauseAndEffect
    CauseAndEffect Hace 4 meses

    Only current design matters. If the host of this video only spoke about facts, he would have said much less.

  • Zeph
    Zeph Hace 4 meses

    But evolution forgot some fish, like the Caelocanth , Arawana and Alligator Gar, while on the other hand, humans have been living on Earth for at least 2.8 billion years now. All things considered, evolution is an incomplete hypothesis which hasn't been proven as yet and has too many holes in it to be a viable theory..

    • Zeph
      Zeph Hace 3 meses

      Have a peanut and shut up esclips.com/video/rDxwd0614lc/vídeo.html

    • Zeph
      Zeph Hace 3 meses

      He he he..."Debbil monkey", how do you ever expect others to take you seriously?

    • Devilmonkey
      Devilmonkey Hace 3 meses +1

      Are you retarded?
      Humans HAVE NOT been on earth for 2.8 billion years and evolution has been proven.
      We have evidence.... You know, that thing that all religions lack.

  • Ciprian Popa
    Ciprian Popa Hace 4 meses

    you may find that iaptus sea is actualy Iapetus

  • Traveling Boi
    Traveling Boi Hace 4 meses

    Everyone arguing under me is gay haha.

  • Sin Slayer
    Sin Slayer Hace 4 meses

    Adaptation is not evolution. FAIL

  • Sivakumar Veerappan
    Sivakumar Veerappan Hace 4 meses

    mahizhchiyana ontru

  • Robert Guest
    Robert Guest Hace 4 meses

    OUR ANCESTORS!!!!....WE WERE NOT FISH!.

  • Vegans are dumb
    Vegans are dumb Hace 4 meses +1

    Christians are dumb.

  • billwiggy
    billwiggy Hace 4 meses

    That Karl Sanders soundtrack tho

  • Landen Chaudion
    Landen Chaudion Hace 4 meses

    Bullshit

  • PaulLonden
    PaulLonden Hace 4 meses

    Stunning!.......👍🏻🌏

  • C T
    C T Hace 4 meses

    Narrator is awesome but the opinions are just that

  • Decembirth
    Decembirth Hace 4 meses

    This was barely about fish!!

  • Mr Spazoid7777
    Mr Spazoid7777 Hace 4 meses

    Non
    fucking
    sense

    • Showmatting
      Showmatting Hace 4 meses

      Mr Spazoid7777 It actually has

  • 金魚ZeZeKingyo
    金魚ZeZeKingyo Hace 4 meses +1

    22:10 *Eusthenopteron! Anyone else favors Eusthenopteron??*

  • mrdanthemanboi9
    mrdanthemanboi9 Hace 4 meses

    What did fish do before they had a jaw?

  • Reaching Higher
    Reaching Higher Hace 4 meses +1

    I adore listening to documentaries like this.
    But I really wish researchers and scientists were more careful with their words. Saying jaw bones were "invented" rather than "developed" gives those among us with no appreciation for the many varied uses of words the idea that there's a magic invisible sky-man who's literally inventing and manufacturing these animals on purpose.

    • hahagotcha!!!!
      hahagotcha!!!! Hace 3 meses

      Reaching Higher ...there's a lot of dialogue in this documentary that's really incorrect.

  • Jerry G
    Jerry G Hace 4 meses

    predate-r

  • Morgan Hopkins
    Morgan Hopkins Hace 4 meses

    No no no no no. Continents moving isn't like that at all!! Continents move SLOWLY people! ffs continents are STILL moving! do you see any live footage of them barreling through the ocean terrorizing fish??

  • Gin Seven
    Gin Seven Hace 5 meses

    The way of the voice, I mean fish.🐉❌🐟

  • PlanetRockJesus
    PlanetRockJesus Hace 5 meses

    As the proponent of a theory that claims that, say, a fish evolved into a reptile, and a reptile into a bird, I think you should understand that there would be fossil evidence for that, but there is none. Where is the succession of fossils showing scales evolving into feathers, or front legs into wings, with hollow bones?

    • Hm Grraarrpffrzz
      Hm Grraarrpffrzz Hace 4 meses +1

      I replied to your other comment, where you basically said the same, so instead of having two discussions in different places at the same time, let's just continue there.

    • PlanetRockJesus
      PlanetRockJesus Hace 4 meses

      And that's the point; YOU guys are the ones putting forth this theory, so the burden of proof is on you. Show us photos of the transitional forms. But here's what the scientists do: they find (for example) an extinct fish fossil, and they lay the fossil on a table. Then, they find an extinct lizard fossil, and they lay it next to the fish fossil, and then boldly proclaim, "This became that!" BUT, if evolution had truly happened, there would be myriads of fossils showing how one kind became another. But too bad for evolutionists, these gradual changes do not exist... anywhere. Please show us the transitions.

    • Hm Grraarrpffrzz
      Hm Grraarrpffrzz Hace 5 meses +1

      - What means have you made use of so far, to confirm that there is zero fossil evidence?
      - What is your alternative to the theory of evolution?
      - Even if we wouldn't have found such fossils, why would that matter? There are hundreds of other transitional fossils, clearly showing how evolution worked over the past million years.

  • painhour
    painhour Hace 5 meses

    Then, all for no reason it all just stopped. AMAZING!!!!

    • Showmatting
      Showmatting Hace 4 meses

      evolution takes hundreds of thousands of years

    • Hm Grraarrpffrzz
      Hm Grraarrpffrzz Hace 4 meses +1

      Well, for how many million years have you watched a species?

    • painhour
      painhour Hace 4 meses

      Hm Grraarrpffrzz no no no, I'm saying I Myself haven't seen physical changes over millions of years.

    • Hm Grraarrpffrzz
      Hm Grraarrpffrzz Hace 4 meses

      So you say that if scientists see animals change / evolve, then that doesn't count, because they just compare generations of animals?

    • painhour
      painhour Hace 4 meses

      Hm Grraarrpffrzz during the actual process I haven't found anything (animals) that has been observed by the human eye to have evolved sin a documented form. Only comparisons of previous and current things

  • Antonio Estrela
    Antonio Estrela Hace 5 meses

    4:22 our ancestors come from placoderms but yes dunkolosteus or biggger placoderms could unt our ancestors

  • shadowsurfer1O1 epic digger

    401280335 401290335 401290335 401290335 401290335 401290335 401290335 401290335

  • Martin Kennedy
    Martin Kennedy Hace 5 meses

    billion years ago. many yrars later they found.

  • JPtv3000
    JPtv3000 Hace 5 meses

    Evolution is fake news here's prof
    esclips.com/video/rbKJrEWvuLs/vídeo.html

    • Hm Grraarrpffrzz
      Hm Grraarrpffrzz Hace 5 meses +1

      Don't click, it's just a clickbait. If the contents of the video he linked to would be useful in any way, he could just sum up some arguments.

  • GAIUS LULIUS CAESAR
    GAIUS LULIUS CAESAR Hace 5 meses

    Thank you Gandalf

  • Rursus
    Rursus Hace 5 meses

    Wrong! The Osteichtyans *were* basal Placoderms!

  • MaDmanex100
    MaDmanex100 Hace 5 meses

    I love biology. So much history to our world and this video uncovers things that most likely took place in that time based on old remains of these wondrous creatures and plants.

  • B.E.G max rebo.
    B.E.G max rebo. Hace 5 meses

    i like the video it explain all the history of fish

  • Dr Victor Fursov - Entomologist Beekeeper Teacher

    Thank you for interesting stories! Best wishes and good luck in your discoveries!

  • PlanetRockJesus
    PlanetRockJesus Hace 5 meses

    This entire video is fiction.

    • PlanetRockJesus
      PlanetRockJesus Hace 4 meses

      Ha!

    • PlanetRockJesus
      PlanetRockJesus Hace 4 meses

      Please just show what animals Eotheroides evolved from and into.

    • Showmatting
      Showmatting Hace 4 meses +1

      PlanetRockJesus School was boring?

    • Hm Grraarrpffrzz
      Hm Grraarrpffrzz Hace 4 meses

      The theory of evolution predicted it's existence. And the theory of evolution was correct (which is no big surprise), and we found the fossil. What it evolved from or into is explained in that list that I gave you earlier. You should have a look at it. You might learn something. We know what it evolved from and into because we found the fossils of the ancestor and successor in the correct area with the correct age.
      How do you know that there is little sediment on the sea floor? And if there actually is little sediment on the seafloor, have you looked into different explanations, rather than that Earth was created recently by magic? Such as currents, for example?
      Do you know what "soft tissue" means? Because a lot of Creationists think that palaeontologists found a chunk of T-Rex meat, which is of course absolutely ignorant and ridiculous.
      The Bible is not a valid source, as it contains a lot of contradictions and mistakes. If you would have studied it, you would know that.
      Our conscience is created by our brain, and not by magic, unless you can prove that.
      Oxford Dictionary: _"book - A written or printed work consisting of pages glued or sewn together along one side and bound in covers."_
      Oxford Dictionary: _"DNA - Deoxyribonucleic acid, a self-replicating material which is present in nearly all living organisms as the main constituent of chromosomes. It is the carrier of genetic information."_
      Obviously DNA is not a book. You are wrong once more.

    • PlanetRockJesus
      PlanetRockJesus Hace 4 meses

      Hi. I checked out Eotheroides, and he's just an extinct water mammal. My question to you is... what did Eotheroides evolved from, or into, and how do you know that? There are not enough in-between fossils to show a gradual change from one to another. It's just speculation. As for the age of Earth, there is very little sediment on the sea floor, we find soft tissue in fossils, to name just a couple. As for the Bible, it's been verified over and over through fulfilled prophecy, geology, history, anthropology... You have a conscience that tells you certain things are right, and certain things are wrong (however warped it may have become), and your DNA is a BOOK that contains billions of instructions. Books don't write themselves.

  • Billymodo
    Billymodo Hace 5 meses

    More un-scientific nonsense from pseudo scientists pushing a false belief system.
    Cartoon animations of what these people believe isn't really science now is it.

    • Quantum Proton
    • Quantum Proton
      Quantum Proton Hace 5 meses

      Let's see the argument in a nutshell:
      Lots of powerful forces are acting up under the earth's crust. Therefore modern continents were formed violently in a great cataclysm that destroyed most life and had many volcanic rock being tossed into the air.
      Water soured out from beneath and made a big flood.That's also how the moon has volcanic rocks. Mar's trenches look a lot like Earth's so the same thing happened to Mars.
      -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
      Yet, you calculated nothing. You didn't calculate approximately how powerful anything was and you didn't calculate how long it lasted. Not a single mathematical calculation was presented. Really, you just assumed the forces would be big enough to cause a disaster without doing the math.
      You claim all organisms lived at the same time. Humans lived with dinosaurs and it could be seen with humans recording dinosaurs.
      Despite the fact that every recording of dinosaurs were forged and faked. The Ica stones are human made, made like very, very recently. They're not even a 100 years old. In fact, investigation says so.
      1) In 1977 during the BBC documentary “Pathway to the Gods”, Uschuya produced a “genuine” Ica stone with a dentist’s drill and claimed to have produced the patina by baking the stone in cow dung (Ica N.d.).
      2) In 1998, after four years of investigation, Spanish investigator Vicente Paris declared the stones a hoax (Ica N.d.). He stated that the stones showed traces of modern paints and abrasives. The strongest evidence he presented was the crispness of the shallow engravings; stones of great age should have substantial erosion of the surfaces (Ica N.d.).
      3) A recent examination of the stones, done in Barcelona by José Antonio Lamich, founder of the Spanish “Hipergea” research group, revealed signs of sandpaper and recent carvings, backing up Paris’ investigations (Polidoro 2002, Feder 2010).
      Sandpaper, modern paints, and dentist tools. They're fake.
      explainedsite.wordpress.com/2016/04/28/inca-stones-explained/\
      I already explained how the footprints were fake. You dismissed them, but again. Basically, dinosaur makes footprints, over time soil fills up holes. That's it. www.nytimes.com/1986/06/17/science/fossils-of-man-tracks-shown-to-be-dinosaurian.html

      With all human and dinosaur examples basically debunked. You need to show a dinosaur fossil with a human fossil, You NEED too. You claimed that there are and people just don't show them, but you need to prove that. Go out into the wild and search for the fossils yourself then.

      You never considered the millions of species that are dead. In fact, you just considered the dinosaurs. Again, with your model, you failed to calculate the atmospheric pressure and you failed to calculate the average temperature of the earth. You never did, you just assumed it would be perfect conditions, despite the fact there's no such thing as 'perfect'. Quite frankly, you need to go do some maths and see just how hot earth would be if the clouds blocked out the stars. Get a piece of paper and do some algebra courses. Try to deduce it and do it now. If you can't then you're just assuming everything.
      You also need to consider the kinds of environments every single species lived in. Your perfect environment isn't going to work for all of them, and you need to research the environments these creatures live in.
      You never considered the other continents before Pangaea. You never even addressed it.

    • Quantum Proton
      Quantum Proton Hace 5 meses

      I've linked quite a few actual scientific reports about various things. All you did was ignore each one of them

    • Quantum Proton
      Quantum Proton Hace 5 meses

      You didn't consider anything I pointed you. You either just ignored them, dismissed them or just plain out lied about them. I'll have to repeat them several times before you to even address them.
      Nothing you've said is new, surprisingly enough I've heard every point you mentioned before separate times. I've heard about the bible's dinosaurs, I've heard about the human footprints, I've heard about mitochondrial Eve, I've hear about Neo Darwinism and really just about every since thing. Nothing new at all, it's especially disappointing that it's the exact same thing over and over again.
      All you ever do is lie and deliberately misinterpret information, expecting people to buy it. You refused to accept when something's debunked but then you immediately believe everything once it fit's your narrative. You've repeatedly demonstrated your lack of understanding in basic Natural Selection and you act as if Evolution and Natural Selection are completely different when they're essentially synonyms. You mixed up abiogenesis with Evolution. You refused to accept that religious people are the ones working on Evolution and literally every science you disagree with is labelled a cult.

      Everything you've said is a deliberate misrepresentation and all you've done is switch topics, leaving biology for the majority of it.

      1)You cannot properly date your assumed event
      2) You cannot show any dinosaur fossils that's on the same layer as humans. Nor can you show any fossils that's been burnt. Nor can you explain how fossils are in obvious layers. You simply just dismiss them, ignoring it exists.
      3)You misrepresent information deliberately.
      4)You have no actual mathematical calculation, and you're just guess to certain things operate without any credible approval. You don't know how much a completely cloudy atmosphere would affect life. You never calculated the pressure or anything
      5)Most of all, you reject anything that doesn't fit your personal cult. Instead, you attempt to project your own flaws on science's expecting people to not realize that.

      You being nothing new at all.
      The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection is a scientific theory independently accepted by every scientific community. Creationism has lost against evolution in the court of law and most Darwinist are Christians.
      Most scientist are religious and every one of them would outright tell you. You're wrong. And you have been wrong about everything.
      So what's the excuse this time? Those aren't real Christians?

    • Billymodo
      Billymodo Hace 5 meses

      You still aren't getting it are you?... Don't you see how utterly silly your arguments are to someone who used to think the way you do but moved on after examining the data.
      I look back now and can't believe how I ever fell for the ridiculous nonsense I was taught from childhood.
      I have challenged the core beliefs programmed into you as a vulnerable child and I feel sad for you. Perhaps one day you'll understand that my challenge to the orthodoxy is not a personal attack on you. I have read, understood and deeply considered all the assertions you have written and I have found them to be false and easy to dismiss.
      You on the other hand have simply countered my discussion points with typical kneejerk responses. You have responded in accordance with your programming without reading, understanding and considering the points I've made.
      You are an intelligent correspondent and maybe one day you'll use that intelligence in a way that separates us from the animal kingdom.
      You won't be breaking any laws if you have doubts about the things you were taught as a child. You have the right to examine and test everything you know.
      What's the worst that could happen? You'll either reconfirm your cult beliefs or you'll see how vapid they are.
      I wish you well either way.

  • dooterscoots
    dooterscoots Hace 6 meses

    Those first ten seconds are gold

  • john vines
    john vines Hace 6 meses

    Since dawn of evolution, the game of nature was eat or be eaten, why didn't the biological animals simply harness the power of light to create energy like plants? and why are some plants today evolved to eat flesh . . . Nature is crazy and full of miseries

  • jay Tarantula
    jay Tarantula Hace 6 meses

    "trees that are white without bark" guess the "expert" never heard of a birch tree

  • Raheem Shumate
    Raheem Shumate Hace 6 meses

    The narrator sounds like a child molester

  • Sean Kennedy
    Sean Kennedy Hace 6 meses

    But if fish evolutioned then why do we have lizards hmmm?

  • kurDxNation
    kurDxNation Hace 6 meses

    "human evolved from apes"
    i say fuck it its too short to sum things up like this.
    danm it

  • Thomas Hayes
    Thomas Hayes Hace 6 meses

    It's 1 am why am I watching a documentary about the history of fish

  • Martin G
    Martin G Hace 6 meses

    HAHAHAHA!!! 450 million years ago? Darwinists certainly have lively imaginations. The most unscientific religion on Earth.

    • gog 1284
      gog 1284 Hace 6 meses

      i educate through star wars. i will learn to become a Jedi like my father.

    • Martin G
      Martin G Hace 6 meses

      +gog 1284 Oh, my apologies, I didn't realize they'd found the Millennium fucking Falcon! Haha! Dude, seriously. Watch Kent Hovind on ESclips and forget about Star Wars. Educate yourself, you'll be happy you did later in life.

    • gog 1284
      gog 1284 Hace 6 meses

      but they have found the millennium falcon in california.

    • Dev B
      Dev B Hace 6 meses

      Martin G, HA! Thank you, it's been awhile since I talked with someone so clueless. I understand not only the things you've said, but why you cannot back any of them up. I'm not whining, I'm pointing out your assertions are meaningless and that saying "go watch this idiots videos" is also meaningless. Please, for your own sake, stop deluding yourself and actually read ANY scientific papers on the subject. Your conception of this is tragically wrong.

  • Oink ards
    Oink ards Hace 6 meses

    I feel like fossils are sculpted and commissioned by the Illuminati to keep the sheeple dumb.

  • Garlic Wind
    Garlic Wind Hace 6 meses

    God came to the Garden of Eden to visit Adam and Eve. He found Adam by himself and asked where Eve was.
    "Oh, she's just having a swim in the river," says Adam.
    Replies God, "Oh, no, now all the fish are going to smell like that, too!"

  • Duncan Griffiths
    Duncan Griffiths Hace 6 meses

    Tell me more about these ECHO-systems.

  • Hubcap _ Truth filter for You Tube

    Evolution, the complete fairy tale....the true facts for those that can think.
    esclips.com/video/b2qVS1uBi5k/vídeo.html&t=5s

  • Greg E
    Greg E Hace 6 meses +3

    i don't want to start a sh&%storm in the comment section but this is way WAY more majestic and beautiful than the cop-out "god did it" ugh how uninspired

  • Zeek M
    Zeek M Hace 6 meses

    There is mutation of fish and variation of fish but no evolution of a fish species.
    A particular species remains the same except under a condition where there is a successful DNA combination.

    • Hm Grraarrpffrzz
      Hm Grraarrpffrzz Hace 6 meses

      So if we consider a situation where the flora of an environment changes (as it happens all the time), for example from lots of trees to fewer and fewer trees, then a giraffe with with a shorter neck (due to DNA variation as you call it) would have an advantage over giraffes with longer necks. Due to having an advantage, it's chances of procreating are bigger, and thus passing on its gene variation, increasing the likelyhood of getting offspring with a shorter neck.
      Keep continueing that over enough generations, and you end up with giraffes with significantly shorter necks, evolved to survive in the new environment.
      That's what happened the other way round in the past. Fossils of older giraffes were found, that had shorter necks. The further back you go, the shorter their necks were. Go back far enough, and you end up with some antelope like species, that was the ancestor of both our giraffes and antelopes.

    • Zeek M
      Zeek M Hace 6 meses

      Negative, Mutation takes place if the DNA is damaged.
      a longer or shorter neck would not be DNA damage.
      It would be considered DNA variation for sure, possible a attempt to adapt to environmental changes.
      Environment plays a key role in the development of an organism.

    • Hm Grraarrpffrzz
      Hm Grraarrpffrzz Hace 6 meses

      Do you think that, for example, a mutation might cause a giraffe to have a slightly shorter neck?

    • Zeek M
      Zeek M Hace 6 meses

      I can say a gas tank is part of a car but it doesn't make it so.
      You'll need to prove mutation causes a superior feature over the original organism.
      As I would need to prove a gas tank makes a vehicle superior to one that may already have a fuel bladder.
      Working with the theoretical is fun, I do like to work with the actual material.

    • Hm Grraarrpffrzz
      Hm Grraarrpffrzz Hace 6 meses

      You are right. They are not the same. But mutations are one of the core mechanics that work together resulting in evolution.

  • jpm5243
    jpm5243 Hace 6 meses

    YOU FUCKING IDIOT!!! STOP TELLING FACTLESS FAIRY TALES!!!

    • gog 1284
      gog 1284 Hace 6 meses

      this isnt a video on noahs ark

    • Hm Grraarrpffrzz
      Hm Grraarrpffrzz Hace 6 meses

      Are you addressing your local priest?

  • Mike and Julie Tapp
    Mike and Julie Tapp Hace 6 meses

    yeah

  • Renegade Douglas
    Renegade Douglas Hace 6 meses

    Got it. You would have to be on acid to believe this garbage.

  • Gideon Schnapp
    Gideon Schnapp Hace 6 meses

    :o

  • ates isoa
    ates isoa Hace 6 meses

    I thought this was about fish.

  • Keone Jones
    Keone Jones Hace 6 meses

    I can’t just watch a science video without salty althiests and salty Christians disrespecting each others beliefs..

  • Ken Deininger
    Ken Deininger Hace 6 meses

    I liked your Video..I learned something.. IF you like outdoors you might like this Video..It’s a Underwater shot of a Large snapping turtle eating chicken bones. It looks like a prehistoric Dinosaur...If you can, Could you subscribe to mine channel. (Need to get to 1000 subscribers)...The Video esclips.com/video/wjmIBDyqSJ4/vídeo.html Thanks for sharing

  • Femto
    Femto Hace 6 meses +1

    Goes to comments eats popcorn while scrolling and looks for Christian comments