The Evolution of Fish

  • Publicado el 23 ene 2016
  • The evolution of fish began about 530 million years ago during the Cambrian explosion. Early fish from the fossil record are represented by a group of small, jawless, armoured fish known as ostracoderms. Jawless fish lineages are mostly extinct. An extant clade, the lampreys may approximate ancient pre-jawed fish. The first jaws are found in Placoderm fossils. The diversity of jawed vertebrates may indicate the evolutionary advantage of a jawed mouth. It is unclear if the advantage of a hinged jaw is greater biting force, improved respiration, or a combination of factors. The evolution of fish is not studied as a single event since fish do not represent a monophyletic group but a paraphyletic one (by exclusion of the tetrapods).

Comentarios • 2 413

  • Morbid Madness
    Morbid Madness Hace 20 horas


  • Amy
    Amy Hace un día

    Devonian Age Aquatic Dinosaur/Marine Life

  • ThecatassassinX 69
    ThecatassassinX 69 Hace un día

    so wait does this count the theory of pangea? he says "continentSSS" so does that mean pangea happend after all this or before. can someone plz awnser

  • Tim Hansen
    Tim Hansen Hace 5 días

    I would sell my soul to be able to travel back in time and walk through a Devonian forest.

  • Jemmy Wiratama
    Jemmy Wiratama Hace 6 días +1

    His voice 👏

  • Steve Arcus
    Steve Arcus Hace 7 días

    I really like science and the way it proves various things, but can't stand it when stories are made up to try and justify a theory. Undersea fossil A came out of the sea and became a land creature as fossil P, so the theory goes, but despite the huge fossil records scientists themselves admit there is no fossils C, E, G, I, K, G etc showing the transformation between the two to prove the process. Nor are there any creatures living at the half way point of the theorised macro evolution transformation.

    • Eddie X
      Eddie X Hace 5 días

      No crocoduck, right?

  • Alaskan Husky
    Alaskan Husky Hace 9 días

    Phenomenal! Who could have thought that a new kind of treeis the reason modern fish have bladder.

  • anonyarena
    anonyarena Hace 10 días

    at 12:57 I don't understand. - I was under the impression trees evolved to grow tall in order to better protect it's leaves from ground-level grazing animals. If the archaeopteris tree evolved to be tall during a time period before the first fish evolved into amphibians, what then was the evolutionary advantage of a 20m/60ft height?

  • Scott  Tomlin
    Scott Tomlin Hace 14 días

    Evolution is so damn stupid.
    So your telling me that a space the size of a period, exploded and made everything. You people are tapped. And we humans came from monkeys.
    Than what are the monkeys doing here. And if the earth is millions or billions of years old
    Where are all the human remains? This whole video is a bullfaced lie. And you Godless sheep BELIEVE it.

    • Lenny Mice
      Lenny Mice Hace 11 días +3

      Scott Tomlin
      That's simplifying the big bang a bit but yes, that's what happened in a roundabout way.
      The great apes (chimpanzees, bonobos, orangutans and gorillas) are the animals that we share the closest common ancentry with. Monkeys are much more distant relatives. But in any case, why WOULDN'T the great apes or monkeys be here?
      The Earth is 4.543 billion years old. Humanity hasn't existed since the Earth first formed though. Humanity is only a few hundred thousand years old. So human remains only exist from within that period.

  • Matt McGovern
    Matt McGovern Hace 14 días

    The thumbnail is infinity percent nope!!!

  • Chris Bonilla
    Chris Bonilla Hace 16 días

    It’s funny how people accept this as fact. And the history channel airs shit like this all the time, but ima throw out my tv soon.

  • Gudjon Pall Gudmundsson
    Gudjon Pall Gudmundsson Hace 21 un día

    Scientists believe. Very good program indeed!!

  • Fred Flintstone
    Fred Flintstone Hace 21 un día

    "The invention of the jaw".. .. ..

  • DSchea
    DSchea Hace 23 días

    3:33 looks like a cock rock lmaooo

  • The pac Fish
    The pac Fish Hace 25 días

    Ho come because the megalodon?

  • Mudisuda Raman
    Mudisuda Raman Hace 27 días

    Videos like this must come with a warning that nobody really knows. These are based on speculations, assumptions and blind faith.

    • Mudisuda Raman
      Mudisuda Raman Hace 8 días

      YOU DO NOT KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A THEORY AND A LAW IN SCIENCE. If you would meet Dawkins he will confirm to you that in Science EVOLUTION is a theory. The problem with a theory unlike a law is that it could be challenged and trashed. You also have to understand that theory does not mean that it is wrong. That means you cannot dismiss evolution on the basis that it is a theory.

    • Hm Grraarrpffrzz
      Hm Grraarrpffrzz Hace 8 días

      There are no laws in empirical sciences, Mudisuda. Theories are in empirical science the most accurate form of description of a process or event. Again, you are uneducated and ignorant, and in addition you are too arrogant to assume that you might be wrong.

    • Mudisuda Raman
      Mudisuda Raman Hace 17 días

      Cambrian Explosion: bigger problem for Darwinism than ever.ídeo.html

    • Mudisuda Raman
      Mudisuda Raman Hace 18 días

      The other matter where you erred is that I never stated or implied that something being a theory MAKES IT FALSE simply because it is a theory. There is a difference in Science between a theory and a Law. The latter is OBSERVABLE.

  • Chris Keith
    Chris Keith Hace 27 días

    Coelacanths fossils from 65 million years ago look identical to Coelacanths today.
    They were thought to be extinct and transitional species between fish and reptiles, but lo and behold they were found alive today doing just fine. And the supposed anatomical features that were imagined to be transitional were absolutely not.
    Now I know evolutionist will jump to " perfectly suited environment" but there is zero evidence that they had some magical niche that was undisturbed for eons. Even worse is they have found 300 + supposed million year old Coelacanths and their morphology is virtually identical to Coelacanths of today, too How was this species of fish able to survive that many millions of years without its genome being changed from all the mutations that would have no doubt accrued over that time?
    Answer: It couldn't have. Best answer is it is not millions of years old.

    • Devilmonkey
      Devilmonkey Hace 18 días

      Ignorance of Science is not evidence against it......

    • Hm Grraarrpffrzz
      Hm Grraarrpffrzz Hace 20 días

      That coelacanth "looks" to you the same. But it is not the same. It evolves, but it evolves slowly. Claiming that it didn't evolve is ignorant, as scientists have learned a lot about its genome recently and published new studies on the differently evolved clades of that species.
      Your entire argument is based on your ignorance.

  • Blurry Flag
    Blurry Flag Hace 27 días

    where's the second part?

  • Marcin Kielkiewicz
    Marcin Kielkiewicz Hace 29 días

    +10 for dramatic music.

  • TheNurdbilly
    TheNurdbilly Hace un mes

    The lack of this part is why I was so disappointed in Spore.

  • readyxxi
    readyxxi Hace un mes

    evolution is a LIE

  • H
    H Hace un mes

    6/10 not enough fish

  • brooks townsley
    brooks townsley Hace un mes

    If you believe this nonsense then you'll believe this multiple genders infinite amount according to new College teachings

  • Bernie Schlàfer
    Bernie Schlàfer Hace un mes

    It's such a lovely story or version of life on earth... but one thing these scientists never seem to be able to give an answer to
    This 1st tree ? ? Grew and dropped leaves for food to develops into the soil!!?? As is being told And in doing so it gave food and chances for other plant life to take hold to develope to grow.... Oh it really does sound very nice and all.... But scientist
    " where are the seeds coming from that create all of these trees and plants including life....."
    No scientist can give an answer
    No plant can grow from nothing It MUST have a seed. So where were they from???

  • John 14: 9 من رآني فقد رأى الآب

    When fish can tap dance I'll believe this nonsense.

  • Rafly Maulana
    Rafly Maulana Hace un mes

    i like dinosaur

  • Joseph Selkow
    Joseph Selkow Hace un mes

    Obligatory subscribe button? LOL
    I had no choice. Fantastic content.

  • CauseAndEffect
    CauseAndEffect Hace un mes

    Only current design matters. If the host of this video only spoke about facts, he would have said much less.

  • Zeph
    Zeph Hace un mes

    But evolution forgot some fish, like the Caelocanth , Arawana and Alligator Gar, while on the other hand, humans have been living on Earth for at least 2.8 billion years now. All things considered, evolution is an incomplete hypothesis which hasn't been proven as yet and has too many holes in it to be a viable theory..

    • Zeph
      Zeph Hace 18 días

      Have a peanut and shut upídeo.html

    • Zeph
      Zeph Hace 18 días

      He he he..."Debbil monkey", how do you ever expect others to take you seriously?

    • Devilmonkey
      Devilmonkey Hace 18 días +1

      Are you retarded?
      Humans HAVE NOT been on earth for 2.8 billion years and evolution has been proven.
      We have evidence.... You know, that thing that all religions lack.

  • Ciprian Popa
    Ciprian Popa Hace un mes

    you may find that iaptus sea is actualy Iapetus

  • Handmade Memes
    Handmade Memes Hace un mes

    Everyone arguing under me is gay haha.

  • Sin Slayer
    Sin Slayer Hace un mes

    Adaptation is not evolution. FAIL

  • Sivakumar Veerappan
    Sivakumar Veerappan Hace un mes

    mahizhchiyana ontru

  • Robert Guest
    Robert Guest Hace un mes


  • Vegans are dumb
    Vegans are dumb Hace un mes +1

    Christians are dumb.

  • billwiggy
    billwiggy Hace un mes

    That Karl Sanders soundtrack tho

  • Landen Chaudion
    Landen Chaudion Hace un mes


  • PaulLonden
    PaulLonden Hace un mes


  • C T
    C T Hace un mes

    Narrator is awesome but the opinions are just that

  • Decembirth
    Decembirth Hace un mes

    This was barely about fish!!

  • Mr Spazoid7777
    Mr Spazoid7777 Hace un mes


    • Showmatting
      Showmatting Hace un mes

      Mr Spazoid7777 It actually has

  • Zeze Whiite
    Zeze Whiite Hace un mes +1

    22:10 *Eusthenopteron! Anyone else favors Eusthenopteron??*

  • mrdanthemanboi9
    mrdanthemanboi9 Hace un mes

    What did fish do before they had a jaw?

  • Reaching Higher
    Reaching Higher Hace un mes +1

    I adore listening to documentaries like this.
    But I really wish researchers and scientists were more careful with their words. Saying jaw bones were "invented" rather than "developed" gives those among us with no appreciation for the many varied uses of words the idea that there's a magic invisible sky-man who's literally inventing and manufacturing these animals on purpose.

    • hahagotcha!!!!
      hahagotcha!!!! Hace 21 un hora

      Reaching Higher ...there's a lot of dialogue in this documentary that's really incorrect.

  • Jerry G
    Jerry G Hace un mes


  • Morgan Hopkins
    Morgan Hopkins Hace un mes

    No no no no no. Continents moving isn't like that at all!! Continents move SLOWLY people! ffs continents are STILL moving! do you see any live footage of them barreling through the ocean terrorizing fish??

  • Gin Seven
    Gin Seven Hace 2 meses

    The way of the voice, I mean fish.🐉❌🐟

  • PlanetRockJesus
    PlanetRockJesus Hace 2 meses

    As the proponent of a theory that claims that, say, a fish evolved into a reptile, and a reptile into a bird, I think you should understand that there would be fossil evidence for that, but there is none. Where is the succession of fossils showing scales evolving into feathers, or front legs into wings, with hollow bones?

    • Hm Grraarrpffrzz
      Hm Grraarrpffrzz Hace un mes +1

      I replied to your other comment, where you basically said the same, so instead of having two discussions in different places at the same time, let's just continue there.

    • PlanetRockJesus
      PlanetRockJesus Hace un mes

      And that's the point; YOU guys are the ones putting forth this theory, so the burden of proof is on you. Show us photos of the transitional forms. But here's what the scientists do: they find (for example) an extinct fish fossil, and they lay the fossil on a table. Then, they find an extinct lizard fossil, and they lay it next to the fish fossil, and then boldly proclaim, "This became that!" BUT, if evolution had truly happened, there would be myriads of fossils showing how one kind became another. But too bad for evolutionists, these gradual changes do not exist... anywhere. Please show us the transitions.

    • Hm Grraarrpffrzz
      Hm Grraarrpffrzz Hace un mes +1

      - What means have you made use of so far, to confirm that there is zero fossil evidence?
      - What is your alternative to the theory of evolution?
      - Even if we wouldn't have found such fossils, why would that matter? There are hundreds of other transitional fossils, clearly showing how evolution worked over the past million years.

  • painhour
    painhour Hace 2 meses

    Then, all for no reason it all just stopped. AMAZING!!!!

    • Showmatting
      Showmatting Hace un mes

      evolution takes hundreds of thousands of years

    • Hm Grraarrpffrzz
      Hm Grraarrpffrzz Hace un mes +1

      Well, for how many million years have you watched a species?

    • painhour
      painhour Hace un mes

      Hm Grraarrpffrzz no no no, I'm saying I Myself haven't seen physical changes over millions of years.

    • Hm Grraarrpffrzz
      Hm Grraarrpffrzz Hace un mes

      So you say that if scientists see animals change / evolve, then that doesn't count, because they just compare generations of animals?

    • painhour
      painhour Hace un mes

      Hm Grraarrpffrzz during the actual process I haven't found anything (animals) that has been observed by the human eye to have evolved sin a documented form. Only comparisons of previous and current things

  • Antonio Estrela
    Antonio Estrela Hace 2 meses

    4:22 our ancestors come from placoderms but yes dunkolosteus or biggger placoderms could unt our ancestors

  • shadowsurfer1O1 epic digger

    401280335 401290335 401290335 401290335 401290335 401290335 401290335 401290335

  • Martin Kennedy
    Martin Kennedy Hace 2 meses

    billion years ago. many yrars later they found.

  • JPtv3000
    JPtv3000 Hace 2 meses

    Evolution is fake news here's profídeo.html

    • Hm Grraarrpffrzz
      Hm Grraarrpffrzz Hace 2 meses +1

      Don't click, it's just a clickbait. If the contents of the video he linked to would be useful in any way, he could just sum up some arguments.

  • Jean Pierre Ngeze
    Jean Pierre Ngeze Hace 2 meses

    Thank you Gandalf

  • Rursus
    Rursus Hace 2 meses

    Wrong! The Osteichtyans *were* basal Placoderms!

  • MaDmanex100
    MaDmanex100 Hace 2 meses

    I love biology. So much history to our world and this video uncovers things that most likely took place in that time based on old remains of these wondrous creatures and plants.

  • B.E.G max rebo E.G.
    B.E.G max rebo E.G. Hace 2 meses

    i like the video it explain all the history of fish

  • Dr Victor Fursov - Entomologist Beekeeper Teacher

    Thank you for interesting stories! Best wishes and good luck in your discoveries!

  • PlanetRockJesus
    PlanetRockJesus Hace 2 meses

    This entire video is fiction.

    • PlanetRockJesus
      PlanetRockJesus Hace un mes


    • PlanetRockJesus
      PlanetRockJesus Hace un mes

      Please just show what animals Eotheroides evolved from and into.

    • Showmatting
      Showmatting Hace un mes +1

      PlanetRockJesus School was boring?

    • Hm Grraarrpffrzz
      Hm Grraarrpffrzz Hace un mes

      The theory of evolution predicted it's existence. And the theory of evolution was correct (which is no big surprise), and we found the fossil. What it evolved from or into is explained in that list that I gave you earlier. You should have a look at it. You might learn something. We know what it evolved from and into because we found the fossils of the ancestor and successor in the correct area with the correct age.
      How do you know that there is little sediment on the sea floor? And if there actually is little sediment on the seafloor, have you looked into different explanations, rather than that Earth was created recently by magic? Such as currents, for example?
      Do you know what "soft tissue" means? Because a lot of Creationists think that palaeontologists found a chunk of T-Rex meat, which is of course absolutely ignorant and ridiculous.
      The Bible is not a valid source, as it contains a lot of contradictions and mistakes. If you would have studied it, you would know that.
      Our conscience is created by our brain, and not by magic, unless you can prove that.
      Oxford Dictionary: _"book - A written or printed work consisting of pages glued or sewn together along one side and bound in covers."_
      Oxford Dictionary: _"DNA - Deoxyribonucleic acid, a self-replicating material which is present in nearly all living organisms as the main constituent of chromosomes. It is the carrier of genetic information."_
      Obviously DNA is not a book. You are wrong once more.

    • PlanetRockJesus
      PlanetRockJesus Hace un mes

      Hi. I checked out Eotheroides, and he's just an extinct water mammal. My question to you is... what did Eotheroides evolved from, or into, and how do you know that? There are not enough in-between fossils to show a gradual change from one to another. It's just speculation. As for the age of Earth, there is very little sediment on the sea floor, we find soft tissue in fossils, to name just a couple. As for the Bible, it's been verified over and over through fulfilled prophecy, geology, history, anthropology... You have a conscience that tells you certain things are right, and certain things are wrong (however warped it may have become), and your DNA is a BOOK that contains billions of instructions. Books don't write themselves.

  • Billymodo
    Billymodo Hace 2 meses

    More un-scientific nonsense from pseudo scientists pushing a false belief system.
    Cartoon animations of what these people believe isn't really science now is it.

    • Quantum Proton
    • Quantum Proton
      Quantum Proton Hace 2 meses

      Let's see the argument in a nutshell:
      Lots of powerful forces are acting up under the earth's crust. Therefore modern continents were formed violently in a great cataclysm that destroyed most life and had many volcanic rock being tossed into the air.
      Water soured out from beneath and made a big flood.That's also how the moon has volcanic rocks. Mar's trenches look a lot like Earth's so the same thing happened to Mars.
      Yet, you calculated nothing. You didn't calculate approximately how powerful anything was and you didn't calculate how long it lasted. Not a single mathematical calculation was presented. Really, you just assumed the forces would be big enough to cause a disaster without doing the math.
      You claim all organisms lived at the same time. Humans lived with dinosaurs and it could be seen with humans recording dinosaurs.
      Despite the fact that every recording of dinosaurs were forged and faked. The Ica stones are human made, made like very, very recently. They're not even a 100 years old. In fact, investigation says so.
      1) In 1977 during the BBC documentary “Pathway to the Gods”, Uschuya produced a “genuine” Ica stone with a dentist’s drill and claimed to have produced the patina by baking the stone in cow dung (Ica N.d.).
      2) In 1998, after four years of investigation, Spanish investigator Vicente Paris declared the stones a hoax (Ica N.d.). He stated that the stones showed traces of modern paints and abrasives. The strongest evidence he presented was the crispness of the shallow engravings; stones of great age should have substantial erosion of the surfaces (Ica N.d.).
      3) A recent examination of the stones, done in Barcelona by José Antonio Lamich, founder of the Spanish “Hipergea” research group, revealed signs of sandpaper and recent carvings, backing up Paris’ investigations (Polidoro 2002, Feder 2010).
      Sandpaper, modern paints, and dentist tools. They're fake.\
      I already explained how the footprints were fake. You dismissed them, but again. Basically, dinosaur makes footprints, over time soil fills up holes. That's it.

      With all human and dinosaur examples basically debunked. You need to show a dinosaur fossil with a human fossil, You NEED too. You claimed that there are and people just don't show them, but you need to prove that. Go out into the wild and search for the fossils yourself then.

      You never considered the millions of species that are dead. In fact, you just considered the dinosaurs. Again, with your model, you failed to calculate the atmospheric pressure and you failed to calculate the average temperature of the earth. You never did, you just assumed it would be perfect conditions, despite the fact there's no such thing as 'perfect'. Quite frankly, you need to go do some maths and see just how hot earth would be if the clouds blocked out the stars. Get a piece of paper and do some algebra courses. Try to deduce it and do it now. If you can't then you're just assuming everything.
      You also need to consider the kinds of environments every single species lived in. Your perfect environment isn't going to work for all of them, and you need to research the environments these creatures live in.
      You never considered the other continents before Pangaea. You never even addressed it.

    • Quantum Proton
      Quantum Proton Hace 2 meses

      I've linked quite a few actual scientific reports about various things. All you did was ignore each one of them

    • Quantum Proton
      Quantum Proton Hace 2 meses

      You didn't consider anything I pointed you. You either just ignored them, dismissed them or just plain out lied about them. I'll have to repeat them several times before you to even address them.
      Nothing you've said is new, surprisingly enough I've heard every point you mentioned before separate times. I've heard about the bible's dinosaurs, I've heard about the human footprints, I've heard about mitochondrial Eve, I've hear about Neo Darwinism and really just about every since thing. Nothing new at all, it's especially disappointing that it's the exact same thing over and over again.
      All you ever do is lie and deliberately misinterpret information, expecting people to buy it. You refused to accept when something's debunked but then you immediately believe everything once it fit's your narrative. You've repeatedly demonstrated your lack of understanding in basic Natural Selection and you act as if Evolution and Natural Selection are completely different when they're essentially synonyms. You mixed up abiogenesis with Evolution. You refused to accept that religious people are the ones working on Evolution and literally every science you disagree with is labelled a cult.

      Everything you've said is a deliberate misrepresentation and all you've done is switch topics, leaving biology for the majority of it.

      1)You cannot properly date your assumed event
      2) You cannot show any dinosaur fossils that's on the same layer as humans. Nor can you show any fossils that's been burnt. Nor can you explain how fossils are in obvious layers. You simply just dismiss them, ignoring it exists.
      3)You misrepresent information deliberately.
      4)You have no actual mathematical calculation, and you're just guess to certain things operate without any credible approval. You don't know how much a completely cloudy atmosphere would affect life. You never calculated the pressure or anything
      5)Most of all, you reject anything that doesn't fit your personal cult. Instead, you attempt to project your own flaws on science's expecting people to not realize that.

      You being nothing new at all.
      The Theory of Evolution by Natural Selection is a scientific theory independently accepted by every scientific community. Creationism has lost against evolution in the court of law and most Darwinist are Christians.
      Most scientist are religious and every one of them would outright tell you. You're wrong. And you have been wrong about everything.
      So what's the excuse this time? Those aren't real Christians?

    • Billymodo
      Billymodo Hace 2 meses

      You still aren't getting it are you?... Don't you see how utterly silly your arguments are to someone who used to think the way you do but moved on after examining the data.
      I look back now and can't believe how I ever fell for the ridiculous nonsense I was taught from childhood.
      I have challenged the core beliefs programmed into you as a vulnerable child and I feel sad for you. Perhaps one day you'll understand that my challenge to the orthodoxy is not a personal attack on you. I have read, understood and deeply considered all the assertions you have written and I have found them to be false and easy to dismiss.
      You on the other hand have simply countered my discussion points with typical kneejerk responses. You have responded in accordance with your programming without reading, understanding and considering the points I've made.
      You are an intelligent correspondent and maybe one day you'll use that intelligence in a way that separates us from the animal kingdom.
      You won't be breaking any laws if you have doubts about the things you were taught as a child. You have the right to examine and test everything you know.
      What's the worst that could happen? You'll either reconfirm your cult beliefs or you'll see how vapid they are.
      I wish you well either way.

  • Shaun Victor
    Shaun Victor Hace 2 meses

    Oh My God,can you even help these dreamers Lord? You literally need the faith to move Galaxies to believe in Evolution ! They can paint a pretty picture to be sure,with absolutely no proof whatsoever ! LOL!!!

  • dooterscoots
    dooterscoots Hace 3 meses

    Those first ten seconds are gold

  • john vines
    john vines Hace 3 meses

    Since dawn of evolution, the game of nature was eat or be eaten, why didn't the biological animals simply harness the power of light to create energy like plants? and why are some plants today evolved to eat flesh . . . Nature is crazy and full of miseries

  • jay Tarantula
    jay Tarantula Hace 3 meses

    "trees that are white without bark" guess the "expert" never heard of a birch tree

  • Raheem Shumate
    Raheem Shumate Hace 3 meses

    The narrator sounds like a child molester

  • Sean Kennedy
    Sean Kennedy Hace 3 meses

    But if fish evolutioned then why do we have lizards hmmm?

  • kurDxNation
    kurDxNation Hace 3 meses

    "human evolved from apes"
    i say fuck it its too short to sum things up like this.
    danm it

  • Thomas Hayes
    Thomas Hayes Hace 3 meses

    It's 1 am why am I watching a documentary about the history of fish

  • Martin G
    Martin G Hace 3 meses

    HAHAHAHA!!! 450 million years ago? Darwinists certainly have lively imaginations. The most unscientific religion on Earth.

    • gog 1284
      gog 1284 Hace 3 meses

      i educate through star wars. i will learn to become a Jedi like my father.

    • Martin G
      Martin G Hace 3 meses

      +gog 1284 Oh, my apologies, I didn't realize they'd found the Millennium fucking Falcon! Haha! Dude, seriously. Watch Kent Hovind on ESclips and forget about Star Wars. Educate yourself, you'll be happy you did later in life.

    • gog 1284
      gog 1284 Hace 3 meses

      but they have found the millennium falcon in california.

    • Dev B
      Dev B Hace 3 meses

      Martin G, HA! Thank you, it's been awhile since I talked with someone so clueless. I understand not only the things you've said, but why you cannot back any of them up. I'm not whining, I'm pointing out your assertions are meaningless and that saying "go watch this idiots videos" is also meaningless. Please, for your own sake, stop deluding yourself and actually read ANY scientific papers on the subject. Your conception of this is tragically wrong.

  • Oink ards
    Oink ards Hace 3 meses

    I feel like fossils are sculpted and commissioned by the Illuminati to keep the sheeple dumb.

  • Garlic Fantasy
    Garlic Fantasy Hace 3 meses

    God came to the Garden of Eden to visit Adam and Eve. He found Adam by himself and asked where Eve was.
    "Oh, she's just having a swim in the river," says Adam.
    Replies God, "Oh, no, now all the fish are going to smell like that, too!"

  • Duncan Griffiths
    Duncan Griffiths Hace 3 meses

    Tell me more about these ECHO-systems.

  • Hubcap _ Truth filter for You Tube

    Evolution, the complete fairy tale....the true facts for those that can think.ídeo.html&t=5s

  • Greg E
    Greg E Hace 3 meses +3

    i don't want to start a sh&%storm in the comment section but this is way WAY more majestic and beautiful than the cop-out "god did it" ugh how uninspired

  • Zeek M
    Zeek M Hace 3 meses

    There is mutation of fish and variation of fish but no evolution of a fish species.
    A particular species remains the same except under a condition where there is a successful DNA combination.

    • Hm Grraarrpffrzz
      Hm Grraarrpffrzz Hace 3 meses

      So if we consider a situation where the flora of an environment changes (as it happens all the time), for example from lots of trees to fewer and fewer trees, then a giraffe with with a shorter neck (due to DNA variation as you call it) would have an advantage over giraffes with longer necks. Due to having an advantage, it's chances of procreating are bigger, and thus passing on its gene variation, increasing the likelyhood of getting offspring with a shorter neck.
      Keep continueing that over enough generations, and you end up with giraffes with significantly shorter necks, evolved to survive in the new environment.
      That's what happened the other way round in the past. Fossils of older giraffes were found, that had shorter necks. The further back you go, the shorter their necks were. Go back far enough, and you end up with some antelope like species, that was the ancestor of both our giraffes and antelopes.

    • Zeek M
      Zeek M Hace 3 meses

      Negative, Mutation takes place if the DNA is damaged.
      a longer or shorter neck would not be DNA damage.
      It would be considered DNA variation for sure, possible a attempt to adapt to environmental changes.
      Environment plays a key role in the development of an organism.

    • Hm Grraarrpffrzz
      Hm Grraarrpffrzz Hace 3 meses

      Do you think that, for example, a mutation might cause a giraffe to have a slightly shorter neck?

    • Zeek M
      Zeek M Hace 3 meses

      I can say a gas tank is part of a car but it doesn't make it so.
      You'll need to prove mutation causes a superior feature over the original organism.
      As I would need to prove a gas tank makes a vehicle superior to one that may already have a fuel bladder.
      Working with the theoretical is fun, I do like to work with the actual material.

    • Hm Grraarrpffrzz
      Hm Grraarrpffrzz Hace 3 meses

      You are right. They are not the same. But mutations are one of the core mechanics that work together resulting in evolution.

  • jpm5243
    jpm5243 Hace 3 meses


    • gog 1284
      gog 1284 Hace 3 meses

      this isnt a video on noahs ark

    • Hm Grraarrpffrzz
      Hm Grraarrpffrzz Hace 3 meses

      Are you addressing your local priest?

  • Mike and Julie Tapp
    Mike and Julie Tapp Hace 3 meses


  • Renegade Douglas
    Renegade Douglas Hace 3 meses

    Got it. You would have to be on acid to believe this garbage.

  • Gideon Schnapp
    Gideon Schnapp Hace 3 meses


  • ates isoa
    ates isoa Hace 3 meses

    I thought this was about fish.

  • Skwisgarr Skwigelf
    Skwisgarr Skwigelf Hace 3 meses

    I can’t just watch a science video without salty althiests and salty Christians disrespecting each others beliefs..

  • Ken Deininger
    Ken Deininger Hace 3 meses

    I liked your Video..I learned something.. IF you like outdoors you might like this Video..It’s a Underwater shot of a Large snapping turtle eating chicken bones. It looks like a prehistoric Dinosaur...If you can, Could you subscribe to mine channel. (Need to get to 1000 subscribers)...The Videoídeo.html Thanks for sharing

  • Femto
    Femto Hace 3 meses +1

    Goes to comments eats popcorn while scrolling and looks for Christian comments

  • Asyraf Naqiuddin
    Asyraf Naqiuddin Hace 4 meses

    Islamic comment should be stopped going into the evolution and science believers.Muslims should not allow they rights to speaking they religion to the all human mankind.It is the witchcraft and bloodshed practice.

  • Asyraf Naqiuddin
    Asyraf Naqiuddin Hace 4 meses

    Shark is the best fish which can compete the sea reptiles in dinosaur age and compete the orca and whale in mammals age to became the apex predators.Let's protecting this shark successful evolution today before it is too late.

  • Angelica chan
    Angelica chan Hace 4 meses

    I saw in the bibble god create animals and i saw there a perfect form of fish not evolution. Like monkeys turned into humans?

    • gog 1284
      gog 1284 Hace 3 meses

      read star wars books they are true

  • My Art Page
    My Art Page Hace 4 meses

    The narrator sound familiar..

  • ReaPer_EvO - Critical Ops

    Next Gen Fish AI

  • Pache
    Pache Hace 4 meses +1

    I came here for fish not the earth being petty

  • Galactic Acroz [Skywarpmouse]

    who clicked because there was a placoderm in the thumbnail

  • GBLynden's RC
    GBLynden's RC Hace 4 meses

    Why in the heck was he using spray paint? That is not good for the environment.

  • Evil Norman
    Evil Norman Hace 4 meses

    This is part of the "Miracle Planet" series seen on The Discovery Science channel.

  • Befuddled
    Befuddled Hace 4 meses

    10:22 "Parts of the sea were moved inland where they became rivers and then where the country flattened they became fresh water lakes." Seriously, that's what he said! Many statements he said before that needed fact checking, but that sealed the deal. This source is not credible.

  • Determined Shannon
    Determined Shannon Hace 4 meses +4

    not my proudest fap

    • H
      H Hace un mes

      never gets old.. 10/10 would lol again

    • DaHungry Chomper
      DaHungry Chomper Hace 2 meses

      you made my day

  • Kovai Kalakal
    Kovai Kalakal Hace 4 meses

    I think The first two living Trilobites must be Adam and eve

  • jamgrl38
    jamgrl38 Hace 4 meses

    I can destroy evolution with one question. I dare anyone to challenge me.

    • Nancy Cousintine
      Nancy Cousintine Hace 3 meses

      You are a joke jamgrl38... cars have nothing to do with are giving a false comparison, and you know it. Learn some real science... Trying to have a discussion with someone as ignorant as you are, or are pretending to be is as much of a waste of breathe and text as trying to teach physics to a toddler. You just don't have the intellectual skills, or framework to deal with, or understand pertinent information. What a waste of your brain...basically you are just using it as packing material for your head so the wind doesn't whistle through your ears.

    • Nancy Cousintine
      Nancy Cousintine Hace 3 meses

      Big Bang has nothing to do with biological evolution... you are confusing stellar evolution with something completely different. Typical religionist strawman.

    • jamgrl38
      jamgrl38 Hace 3 meses

      LM: Not one fact is attributed to macro evolution only micro. And, DNA is the building blocks for all life forms. It has now been scientifically proven that it could not have created itself. Therefore, all life forms were created, not randomly chanced into life.

  • 92breads
    92breads Hace 4 meses +3

    Guys! I just saw god zap a toad into existence! I am firmly Christian now thank you for waking me up! 😊☦

  • James Harrington
    James Harrington Hace 4 meses


  • Sleep Getup
    Sleep Getup Hace 4 meses

    k k k g